Collaborative Agreement – Cincinnati

The Cincinnati Black United Front (“Front”), the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation, Inc. (“ACLU”), on behalf of the class, as defined herein (“the Plaintiffs”), the City of Cincinnati (“City”), and the Fraternal Order of Police (“FOP”), hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties” hereby enter into this Collaborative Settlement Agreement dated as of __________________ (the “Agreement” or “Collaborative Agreement”) providing for full and complete settlement of the claims of all of the Parties as described in certain litigation commenced by Plaintiff Bomani Tyehimba against the City and others in United States District Court in case No. C-1-99-317 as later sought to be amended by Amended Complaint and subsequent pleadings filed by the Front and the ACLU on or after March 1, 2001, against the City and others, herein described as the Litigation, in consideration of the mutual promises of the Parties and pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth below, all subject to the approval of the Court.


The overall Collaborative Agreement described in this document contains a description of problem oriented policing which frames the overall philosophy and practices at its core.  Central to a problem solving orientation is that problems are dilemmas to be engaged and learned from and that blame is an obstacle to progress.  The overall collaborative effort suggests an alternative to blame:  that different groups within the community with different experiences and perspectives share much more in common than not, and can work together on common goals and solve problems together. II.


This Collaborative on Police Community Relations was proposed by the Parties, authorized by the City Council of the City of Cincinnati and established by United States District Judge Susan J. Dlott as an alternative dispute resolution effort to resolve social conflict, improve community relations, and avoid divisive litigation.  The Collaborative has been pursued with Judge Dlott’s direction, encouragement and assistance as a joint project of the Parties.  The Litigation alleges racially biased policing by the Cincinnati Police Department (“CPD”).  The City and the FOP have denied the allegations but have agreed to pursue this unique partnership as a means of resolving the conflict.  The court has appointed as Special Master, Jay Rothman, Ph.D., who has been leading the resolution process.

The Collaborative includes outreach to the entire Cincinnati community through eight stakeholder groups: African-Americans, social service and religious organizations, businesses and philanthropic groups, police line officers and spouses, City officials, white citizens, other minorities and youth. The community outreach included responses to an online questionnaire as well as interviews with citizens for whom a computer was not easily accessed. Feedback sessions were used to collect and discuss the information that was gathered.  Over 3500 persons participated in this process. The collaborative also included an expert research effort headed by John Eck, Ph.D., charged with identifying best practices and model programs.  The results of this community dialogue and expert research were shared with the Parties for use in settlement negotiations.

The Parties have studied and received the results from community based work done through Study Circles by the Cincinnati Human Relations Commission; Neighbor to Neighbor, sponsored by numerous Cincinnati organizations; suggestions by the National Conference for Community and Justice (NCCJ) and Cincinnati Community Action Now (CCAN).

The Collaborative has engaged the entire community in a constructive dialogue that has resulted in an ongoing commitment to cooperation between the police and the community. The Parties, through this Agreement, make a commitment to promote and foster this ongoing cooperation.

Download the PDF

pdf  Collaborative Agreement – Cincinnati

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *